Because the NIST and Popular Mechanics are right and the case is closed. Scholars for Truth are a bunch of scary demented people. If you've ever heard any of them talk you have to see that they are psycho, their performances appear almost scripted and when asked questions they get uneasy and bluster their way and answer with their prepared statements.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo鈥?/a>
http://911myths.com
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullrep鈥?/a>
If you read the above sites and still belive in this conspiracy theory see the links below.
http://www.stopabductions.com/
http://www.ericisgreat.com/tinfoilhats/
Jesi, you're a dingbat.
Report Abuse
Why won't NIST or Popular Science debate 9/11 Scholars for Truth?What is there to debate?Why won't NIST or Popular Science debate 9/11 Scholars for Truth?
They don't want the truth spreading like wildfire.
For the same reason reasonable people do not debate whether the Pyramids were built by aliens, or whether the Earth is flat, or whether Neil Armstrong landed on the Moon.
booooooooooooooo!!!!!!!
Bad Question
i get 2 points for answering and you get a big zero for asking an ignorant question.
Hey dumb *** ... You replied to one of my questions today about terrorism and said you would love to debate me on the topic of 9/11 being an inside job... Well, BRING IT ON!!!!!! email me and give me your email address... Bye the way, if you trounced 3 of your professors at your "college" in a debate on 9/11 you are clearly not attending an accredited university...However, I did attend an accredited university and would love to make you look stupid... And after we're done...i want you to get on your knees and beg forgiveness from the VICTIMS of 9/11 that you spit on every day by spreading your fabricated lies...
ILL BE WAITING FOR YOUR EMAIL!!!!!!!!!!!
Because they know it is just as much bull manure as the 9/11 Commission report.
I have tried to read it twice, but can't find any details of any proper investigation at all.
I can't find any comment about the central core, which their entire explanation assumes just didn't exist.
I can find where they decide that there is no evidence of any explosion below the level at which the aircraft hit, which is obviously ludicrous when this is a major point being raised by thousands of people who have studied the videos of the collapse, and I can't find any explanation of how huge 7 ton steel beams were ejected several hundred feet and embedded in surrounding buildings.
In short, its just another complete whitewash by a bunch of dimwits.
And because they are completely aware of that, they cannot risk a public debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment